Group Info

Our concern about OSRS Gold filtering in this case

Our concern about OSRS Gold filtering in this case

Our concern about OSRS Gold filtering in this case is not whether someone will attempt to bypass this, and that comment was just to further the stage that filters aren't always effective. Perhaps mentioning the intentional bypassing was a little off subject for my previous comment. As previously mentioned, the amount of OSRS-specific articles (not pertinent to RS3) submitted this is minimal as is, and they do not amount to a notable portion of our daily posts. However, those posts are outnumbered by other people which compare or link to both matches.

These will likely match the standards to also receive a reply redirecting them to 2007 Runescape when the intention was to post, which is not ideal because it would be irrelevant to the post topic and probably result in complaints. Furthermore, when the criteria is too specific, it is unlikely that the few posts that are designed to receive this reply will trigger it. It's easier for a person to recognize these posts than a bot, and setting it up to be intended is much easier said than done for minimal benefit.

Why are people so toxic to fresh players? Wouldn't also the and also max high ranking players need more people with? More people = more cash, more upgrades (maybe if more started playing, paying, and demanding it) and also more people in Runescape sport which will increase the economy and keep Runescape lasting more. When they're labeled as such we handle players nicely. Dig up any ribbon where the OP admits themselves new and folks here really pile the majority of the time.

It is older, returning veteran players who ask questions we treat. Unless they're asking about the condition of Runescape(meaning they are not spent in Runescape again yet), normally we bad mouth them about how they could possibly be requesting whatever it is they're asking. The neighborhood is smart. If somebody is uninvested at Runescape, everyone is full support towards them. No one actually cares, if they spent.

So, I tardy into the celebration and I apologize for that. I do think using a query thread would be beneficial in the long term. However, it is more a matter of handling what the topics are. Which is a bummer Since we could only have 2 at a time. I replied to someone sooner agreeing that we could begin making a single weekly post which links to news/update posts are added as the week goes on and they are printed to Runescape's website. And I passed that proposal on to the rest of the group for discussion. What we're doing today is a question of,"What exactly do we think has to be viewed the most?" Having it on a single post and updated as needed could help resolve that matter. Even if it's only temporary, it is far better to have something than nothing.

It has bothered me several times because I switched out of OSRS. I have always seen the downvote button like a relevancy indicator, and only actually downvote stuff if it's wildly off topic. It looks like this sub simply loves to downvote people for being new, I can't say I understand it, but I don't actually give a shit anymore. Should neutral karma is held by my queries? Definitely, they're just queries. Nothing positive or negative about them. Do they? No, but sometimes they even back outside to neutral after first getting several downvotes (seems some people are aware that downvoted questions get suppressed and try to Buy RS 3 Gold bring them back up). It shouldn't be like that.

Users

Newsfeed

  • No items