MLCgames's blog
I've played RS off and on RuneScape gold because 2006/2007, I liked the OS content when it was new, and eoc frightened me off like most of the community. However, I came back and gave it a serious try and actually enjoyed it. I have been not able to enjoy OSRS since. RS3 has a huge number of quests, and most have rewards that help you in some way or another even after you're done. In addition to this, they can offer good filler space to when skilling gets dull, and you require a rest or a different way to earn exp.
There is QOL built into RuneScape to stop needing to spend hours doing things that actually should only be done once. I like not needing to amass a knife and lose an inventory space for this, I enjoy being able to travel the world on a whim without half of my inventory being consumed by teleports. I enjoy having my run run out since I spent a couple hours. The QOL is a massive factor for me and it is hard to lose it all when enjoying OSRS. The skilling at RS3 is much faster, and much more afk compared to OSRS. I do enjoy skilling, therefore it being fast and much more afk allows me make progress faster than I could playing OSRS and to do other things. Towards the material I like without feeling like I have wasted who knows the number of hours getting there, I can work In addition to that.
The combat system of RS3 is the best aspect of RuneScape for me, particularly endgame bossing (that I needed to skill to reach). I'm not the PVMer, but that I love being challenged to discover the DPS spinning and blend of teams and perks to use. I love a boss who requires 3 individuals working in coordination to beat reasonably, vorago. Also telos, a boss that could challenge you with benefits rising together with the difficulty. In RS3, you'll have t70 armor and a t75 weapon and if you're good at it, you can out-perform someone in t90 armor along with a weapon that is t90. I like that I will do something based on my abilities and experience, and get rewarded for it.
I don't really care. I played RS2 in my teenagers (mid-30s now) primarily because I had been interested in the botting aspect. I only really got into actually playing RuneScape once RS3 came out. Playing OSRS tried first as it was closer to what I'd played with when I was younger, but I was turned away by how much time it took to walk to areas. It felt as though I spent more time walking than I did actually doing something, and I am an adult with a lot happening, so that it felt like I was wasting a lot of my free time never actually getting to play RuneScape.
Only although I play with a tiny OSRS prefer the combat of RS3 more. To me it is engaging and there is some skill involved. A whole lot of OSRS players see how simple it only say all of battle is the fact that and is to afk something such as gwd1. Well gwd1 is old obsolete content of course it is easy today since it isn't the best lvl pvm such as it somewhat is at OSRS. Another principal difficulty is eoc was complete shit when it first came out and people think it is still the same and shit talk it without ever actually logging in to see it's quite different from when it was launched. Both matches have positives but for me personally the battle in buy OSRS gold is boring afk for everything.
There is QOL built into RuneScape to stop needing to spend hours doing things that actually should only be done once. I like not needing to amass a knife and lose an inventory space for this, I enjoy being able to travel the world on a whim without half of my inventory being consumed by teleports. I enjoy having my run run out since I spent a couple hours. The QOL is a massive factor for me and it is hard to lose it all when enjoying OSRS. The skilling at RS3 is much faster, and much more afk compared to OSRS. I do enjoy skilling, therefore it being fast and much more afk allows me make progress faster than I could playing OSRS and to do other things. Towards the material I like without feeling like I have wasted who knows the number of hours getting there, I can work In addition to that.
The combat system of RS3 is the best aspect of RuneScape for me, particularly endgame bossing (that I needed to skill to reach). I'm not the PVMer, but that I love being challenged to discover the DPS spinning and blend of teams and perks to use. I love a boss who requires 3 individuals working in coordination to beat reasonably, vorago. Also telos, a boss that could challenge you with benefits rising together with the difficulty. In RS3, you'll have t70 armor and a t75 weapon and if you're good at it, you can out-perform someone in t90 armor along with a weapon that is t90. I like that I will do something based on my abilities and experience, and get rewarded for it.
I don't really care. I played RS2 in my teenagers (mid-30s now) primarily because I had been interested in the botting aspect. I only really got into actually playing RuneScape once RS3 came out. Playing OSRS tried first as it was closer to what I'd played with when I was younger, but I was turned away by how much time it took to walk to areas. It felt as though I spent more time walking than I did actually doing something, and I am an adult with a lot happening, so that it felt like I was wasting a lot of my free time never actually getting to play RuneScape.
Only although I play with a tiny OSRS prefer the combat of RS3 more. To me it is engaging and there is some skill involved. A whole lot of OSRS players see how simple it only say all of battle is the fact that and is to afk something such as gwd1. Well gwd1 is old obsolete content of course it is easy today since it isn't the best lvl pvm such as it somewhat is at OSRS. Another principal difficulty is eoc was complete shit when it first came out and people think it is still the same and shit talk it without ever actually logging in to see it's quite different from when it was launched. Both matches have positives but for me personally the battle in buy OSRS gold is boring afk for everything.
We only want more options. We need a game that is similar to 2K MT Path of Exile to Diablo. I am speaking from the point of view of an MyPark participant which is essentially like a seperate match at this point. The good thing is that you would not require a NBA permit to create a game like this. Make a game that is centered on a multiplayer experience. Aggressive (with good game making) and non-competitive modes, different events, well balanced ability system, tournaments using some sort of reward, microtransactions yes, but only for clothes, your private court etc. (could possibly even create NBA 2K20 free such as poe).
To get a NBA-simulation, sure. No demand for a permit to get a MyPark-type game where you make your own player though.99percent is far too high. There are tons of players who never touch another styles and only play MyCareer since it is tied to the playground. Even though NBA 2K20 would only appeal to 10-20percent of those 2k playerbase, that is a standard estimate I think, that could still create a decently sized community. However, I believe that it's not so easy to generate a well rounded basketball game, mainly because of all of the various animations. Career mode is where u make 1 player to play nba together and contrary to established player. Your game would be a bunch of nobodies playing nobodies (image rights duh). It will always be a little game and small community if NBA 2K20play is perfect.
This has been done. Freestyle Basketball was popular for quite a couple of decades, its still running, they left a"sequel" on consoles which I believe is popular if not as popular as the original game. Honestly surprised it hasn't been re-done with a larger budget and somewhat closer to gameplay. But obtaining NBA 2K20play right is likely much harder to do from scratch compared to NBA iterating over exactly what they realized the prior year. Will stay a market game and not a competitor. If you are likening it to Path of Exile and Diablo, it would want the license, which I think is obtainable for the NBA, but nevertheless almost definitely not cheap.
NBA has never been picky using their permit in the past. Leagues. Until that was changed by them. Back in the late 90s there have been several million NBA games. EA do and can make NBA games. They simply don't since it seems like they realise competing with the giant in the room is a ridiculous waste of money.The goes for everybody. That there is no longer nba games. The investment is simply not worthwhile. The EA/2K sports warfare at the early 00s indicates that you are very, very wrong. You could earn a non-licensed sports match, but nobody could buy it.MyPark was only introduced in 2k14. And it is arguably the mode at this point. Obviously a match with a focus on a sensible NBA experience does not make sense without a license, that is not the type of game I had in mind.
I believed they kind of crossed the line so far as microtransactions in NBA2K17 where actual progress of your character was too slow with no major in sport currency bulge. It is still a great game series but those with low tolerance for microtransactions will not have a great time realizing that the in game purchases and skills are usually fairly costly and earning things ingame is more of a grind than it needs to be.I obtained 2k19 for $5 like a month before 2k20. For $5 it was worth and I'll never pay a dime more for those games.And I will never pay another dime for more of those games. No need to buy Sports games annually when they are all the same or worse.
I thought 2K17 was nice. It had been slow, and a grind, but it was sort of leveling up within an RPG. I was ok it took a few games to get a stat point. And the difficulty to increase the gains might turn up. After 2K17 it got pretty awful. 2K18 I believe didn't have a multiplier when you shifted difficulty, so you just play on easy and find exactly the same amount of experience (VC). When it came back in 2K19, it was like NBA 2K20 was developed to be played at the maximum difficulty and after a full season I was only overall 75, LOL. It had been too much. I enjoy NBA 2K20s, but I skipped this season. Maybe I will buy it again in Buy 2K20 MT a later point, since the remainder of NBA 2K20 manners (including from the 2K11 and earlier ) are still there and don't have any microtransactions. The MyCareer thing is merely one more mode.
To get a NBA-simulation, sure. No demand for a permit to get a MyPark-type game where you make your own player though.99percent is far too high. There are tons of players who never touch another styles and only play MyCareer since it is tied to the playground. Even though NBA 2K20 would only appeal to 10-20percent of those 2k playerbase, that is a standard estimate I think, that could still create a decently sized community. However, I believe that it's not so easy to generate a well rounded basketball game, mainly because of all of the various animations. Career mode is where u make 1 player to play nba together and contrary to established player. Your game would be a bunch of nobodies playing nobodies (image rights duh). It will always be a little game and small community if NBA 2K20play is perfect.
This has been done. Freestyle Basketball was popular for quite a couple of decades, its still running, they left a"sequel" on consoles which I believe is popular if not as popular as the original game. Honestly surprised it hasn't been re-done with a larger budget and somewhat closer to gameplay. But obtaining NBA 2K20play right is likely much harder to do from scratch compared to NBA iterating over exactly what they realized the prior year. Will stay a market game and not a competitor. If you are likening it to Path of Exile and Diablo, it would want the license, which I think is obtainable for the NBA, but nevertheless almost definitely not cheap.
NBA has never been picky using their permit in the past. Leagues. Until that was changed by them. Back in the late 90s there have been several million NBA games. EA do and can make NBA games. They simply don't since it seems like they realise competing with the giant in the room is a ridiculous waste of money.The goes for everybody. That there is no longer nba games. The investment is simply not worthwhile. The EA/2K sports warfare at the early 00s indicates that you are very, very wrong. You could earn a non-licensed sports match, but nobody could buy it.MyPark was only introduced in 2k14. And it is arguably the mode at this point. Obviously a match with a focus on a sensible NBA experience does not make sense without a license, that is not the type of game I had in mind.
I believed they kind of crossed the line so far as microtransactions in NBA2K17 where actual progress of your character was too slow with no major in sport currency bulge. It is still a great game series but those with low tolerance for microtransactions will not have a great time realizing that the in game purchases and skills are usually fairly costly and earning things ingame is more of a grind than it needs to be.I obtained 2k19 for $5 like a month before 2k20. For $5 it was worth and I'll never pay a dime more for those games.And I will never pay another dime for more of those games. No need to buy Sports games annually when they are all the same or worse.
I thought 2K17 was nice. It had been slow, and a grind, but it was sort of leveling up within an RPG. I was ok it took a few games to get a stat point. And the difficulty to increase the gains might turn up. After 2K17 it got pretty awful. 2K18 I believe didn't have a multiplier when you shifted difficulty, so you just play on easy and find exactly the same amount of experience (VC). When it came back in 2K19, it was like NBA 2K20 was developed to be played at the maximum difficulty and after a full season I was only overall 75, LOL. It had been too much. I enjoy NBA 2K20s, but I skipped this season. Maybe I will buy it again in Buy 2K20 MT a later point, since the remainder of NBA 2K20 manners (including from the 2K11 and earlier ) are still there and don't have any microtransactions. The MyCareer thing is merely one more mode.
