Imagine if someone with 50 driving dip could posterize 3 from Sagelucy's blog

Imagine if someone NBA 2K MT with 50 driving dip could posterize 3 defenders by simply"greening" a dip. That does take skill, but it doesn't really make sense? So why should non-shooters have the ability to strike any three just by"greening" it? Not exactly the same. I believe that when a participant gets proficient enough to shoot on a build with 50 3pt you need ton't take greens away. I believe NBA 2K23 should reward skill.How is that different from the first comment I made? If someone is skilled enough to green steals with a 50 rating they should have the ability to steals. They need to have the ability to green dunks if somebody is skilled enough to dunks with a 50 driving dunk then.Ever since the flow about NBA 2K23 with a female MyCareer narrative, I've seen tons of posts and videos. Some say we should only have a different neighborhood from them or if they're permitted in precisely the same area as men they will only refuse to play with/against them. Why? Is your masculinity going to be stripped from you by getting your participant crossed by a lady in a basketball game or dunked on?

I understand, watching female MyPlayers breaking ankles and performing flashy dunks isn't"realistic," and this is the shield that opposers of feminine MyPlayers hide behind. But this is NBA 2K we're speaking about. Nobody wishes to bring up realism when folks are rate fostering, moonwalking and levitating around the courtroom with dribble moves, shooting 90 percent from Curry range with hands in Buy NBA 2K MT their faces and performing backflip jump shot landings then, dunking on multiple centres with a 6'3" shield, the crazy events we've like the top, or wearing the ridiculous outfits people wear on the playground. And all that is okay! I really don't play with a game to see and do things that I could see and do in life.