I am not reading into this too much from Smarthuiyuan's blog
On WOW Classic seekers I generally agree but I do feel there are a few exceptions in which things are greatest or most acceptable on classic wow gold hunters versus anybody else. I feel as though polearms are almost only helpful on WOW Classic hunters for instance. On alliance side pretty much no one besides a hunter should want bone slicing hatchet, which also appears to be among the realistic BiS options. I would assert barbarous blade is at a position that is similar, though that is soloable. I also can not imagine who else could really utilize warmonger. Maybe a few swords and daggers open up, although for horde side because of axes I'm not sure what the hunter choices are there.
Hunter prebis and bis are bone slicing hatchet x 2 and Warblade of the Hakkari MH / Fang of the Faceless, respectively. Nobody wants bone slicing hatchet. Rogues may need Fang, but many do not. Fury warriors need warblade longer if they aren't human or orc and do not have Edgemasters, but there is no guarantee. Hunter weapons are pretty damn simple to get at the current stage. But it's not like it matters what a hunter gets in their weapon slots anyhow. The dps gap between using fine weapons to get a Hunter and having BiS weapons is minimal. It is more dressing than anything.
Anyone who believes Dal Rends to be BiS on a hunter needs to reconsider. The difference between this and BSHx2 is tiny, and no set in their right mind if going when a priest or priest needs to let a hunter roster Rends. WOW Classic hunters should be able to roll on any weapon which dps do not need, and nothing that melee dps do want. However, guilds ought to also have an alt policy in order, when you're playing with an alt, you don't have to roll that any main wants. That is the only way to keep things honest.
Former EverQuest Producer Snapped Up to WOW Classic
I am not reading into this too much, probs a general hiring decision by Blizz but because WOW Classic is a topic for gambling news. Doubt you hire someone for a salary to get folks to write about cheap wow gold classic after. I don't think that is what he said, more-so blizzard hired her and sensationalize and gaming outlets will try the hire for clicks.
Hunter prebis and bis are bone slicing hatchet x 2 and Warblade of the Hakkari MH / Fang of the Faceless, respectively. Nobody wants bone slicing hatchet. Rogues may need Fang, but many do not. Fury warriors need warblade longer if they aren't human or orc and do not have Edgemasters, but there is no guarantee. Hunter weapons are pretty damn simple to get at the current stage. But it's not like it matters what a hunter gets in their weapon slots anyhow. The dps gap between using fine weapons to get a Hunter and having BiS weapons is minimal. It is more dressing than anything.
Anyone who believes Dal Rends to be BiS on a hunter needs to reconsider. The difference between this and BSHx2 is tiny, and no set in their right mind if going when a priest or priest needs to let a hunter roster Rends. WOW Classic hunters should be able to roll on any weapon which dps do not need, and nothing that melee dps do want. However, guilds ought to also have an alt policy in order, when you're playing with an alt, you don't have to roll that any main wants. That is the only way to keep things honest.
Former EverQuest Producer Snapped Up to WOW Classic
I am not reading into this too much, probs a general hiring decision by Blizz but because WOW Classic is a topic for gambling news. Doubt you hire someone for a salary to get folks to write about cheap wow gold classic after. I don't think that is what he said, more-so blizzard hired her and sensationalize and gaming outlets will try the hire for clicks.
The Wall