To Interrupt Other Metas from Kin Gang's blog
You ought to be catering to the majority of OSRS gold players. No, because then you emphasise your current playerbase dry and end up in an even worse situation if these new players don't stick around, and that's exactly what pretty much happened these past 2 years besides Quarantine and Arch bringing back a lot of people temporarily. What they actually should be doing is just advertisements RuneScape better, rather than those really shitty ads that only get made fun of the pop up every now and then.
The issue is it is possible to advertise for days but the new player debut to RuneScape is crap. No participant is going to stick around with RuneScape appearing like an alpha launch game from steam. The only truly player experiences that are brand new that are poor are the interface, shitty path systems, as well as the 516 choice menus. It's a open sandbox MMO, it's not a linear MMO where you chain"talk to x""speak to y""kill 10 z""talk to x" quests to progress. OSRS doesn't have a problem despite being as open ended and lack of direction. Because they really get advertisements in the shape of DMM, mobile, content creators, partnerships, etc. Hell even celebs are beginning to flow themselves playing with OSRS which puts even more eyes RuneScape. You'll never find that for RS3.
IMO RS3 should not do polls unless they know the way to make real survey questions. The Comp Cape survey left up many answers as opposed to the sentiments of players and was such a joke. I believe considering how OSRS searched for Warding is pretty clear why they want to steer clear of guaranteed content surveys (imagine us not needing Archaeology).
Another"bad" result of polling is having players view"what could have been" and not enjoying what is in front of them. I know for myself after having seen what might have been but did not pass the poll that Activity pets' selections is not what I would have desired. While I do need player feedback to have a hand in developing RuneScape's future, just how exactly do we go about it while trying to walk in between the lines of content and only suggestions?
They didn't actually ask the right questions when polling attempted, they voted in a damn troll. How do old school runescape buy gold you try to eat bliss?! They probably saw the quantity of work it took the OSRS staff to design and plan the ability they wanted to discharge only for it to have voted down and don't want themselves to have connected to the circumstance. And I know ' our sentiment put in all this work to build a bit of fresh content to present to the gamers, and they spat on it. We'll therefore no longer place attempts in'.
The issue is it is possible to advertise for days but the new player debut to RuneScape is crap. No participant is going to stick around with RuneScape appearing like an alpha launch game from steam. The only truly player experiences that are brand new that are poor are the interface, shitty path systems, as well as the 516 choice menus. It's a open sandbox MMO, it's not a linear MMO where you chain"talk to x""speak to y""kill 10 z""talk to x" quests to progress. OSRS doesn't have a problem despite being as open ended and lack of direction. Because they really get advertisements in the shape of DMM, mobile, content creators, partnerships, etc. Hell even celebs are beginning to flow themselves playing with OSRS which puts even more eyes RuneScape. You'll never find that for RS3.
IMO RS3 should not do polls unless they know the way to make real survey questions. The Comp Cape survey left up many answers as opposed to the sentiments of players and was such a joke. I believe considering how OSRS searched for Warding is pretty clear why they want to steer clear of guaranteed content surveys (imagine us not needing Archaeology).
Another"bad" result of polling is having players view"what could have been" and not enjoying what is in front of them. I know for myself after having seen what might have been but did not pass the poll that Activity pets' selections is not what I would have desired. While I do need player feedback to have a hand in developing RuneScape's future, just how exactly do we go about it while trying to walk in between the lines of content and only suggestions?
They didn't actually ask the right questions when polling attempted, they voted in a damn troll. How do old school runescape buy gold you try to eat bliss?! They probably saw the quantity of work it took the OSRS staff to design and plan the ability they wanted to discharge only for it to have voted down and don't want themselves to have connected to the circumstance. And I know ' our sentiment put in all this work to build a bit of fresh content to present to the gamers, and they spat on it. We'll therefore no longer place attempts in'.
The Wall