I really don't have some issues with BfA from Smarthuiyuan's blog
As a non yang ganger I really don't see where everyone is receiving the noxious label from. Yang gang were the only ones who have alts parked in azshara summoning and wow classic gold viewing. They put in the job and people were mad that yang wouldn't share kills although everyone else was showing up late following yang announced every spawn.From a first incendian alliance standpoint (and I'm talking before any of those scum transfers) the greatest irony in the horde guilds tagging Yang Gang poisonous is the fact that Yang Gang announcing the predominate in world discussion (as well as the geographical vicinity to Orgrimmar) was not the only reason horde ever got an azuregos kill. Kazzak and the fact horde never obtained even one kill on everybody in the alliance coalition knew it and him is evidence that the guilds were simply idle crap riding Yang Gangs jacket tails.The problem with WoW threads is that it's hard to maintain an open mind. Full disclosure: I am playing with the retail WoW, been doing so for years. I really don't have some issues with BfA. It is not WoD either, although it's no Legion. So basically, it is a headbutt competition between"Blizzard can do no wrong" and"Blizzard did everything wrong", possibly attracting their own preconceptions. We've got an example :"Blizzard laid off 800 workers". The article said,"800 workers across multiple sub-companies within A-B and divisions between those companies were laid off". Whether this is really a"bad" thing is dependent upon how you look at it, even though I doubt that"they totally gutted WoW's service staff.
If there's 1 thing the OP and I'd concur though, is that Blizzard is regarding the inner workings of their business. On the other hand, we only have such-and-such term's for it. And there are plenty of legitimate reasons for not disclosing ban algorithms or disclosing the culprit's identity; as it is the playerbase is a bloodthirsty mob.
The bots were coded too auto accept the difference can't be told by the bots and pvp queues, the notification for which spawns a party invite does. The summon out of a warlock portal also appears in this spot, which is how WOW players are able to muster them. With that, the bots for pvp are also typically coded also car attack any enemies which strike them, or nearby party members to maximize the honor gain in battlegrounds. By exploiting this behavior, WOW players have the ability to get robots to spend hours killing civilian NPC's to ruin their honour. The cost of this is one participant also loses the same amount of honour, but also for cheap classic wow gold players never spent in PvP, it's a simple trade.
If there's 1 thing the OP and I'd concur though, is that Blizzard is regarding the inner workings of their business. On the other hand, we only have such-and-such term's for it. And there are plenty of legitimate reasons for not disclosing ban algorithms or disclosing the culprit's identity; as it is the playerbase is a bloodthirsty mob.
The bots were coded too auto accept the difference can't be told by the bots and pvp queues, the notification for which spawns a party invite does. The summon out of a warlock portal also appears in this spot, which is how WOW players are able to muster them. With that, the bots for pvp are also typically coded also car attack any enemies which strike them, or nearby party members to maximize the honor gain in battlegrounds. By exploiting this behavior, WOW players have the ability to get robots to spend hours killing civilian NPC's to ruin their honour. The cost of this is one participant also loses the same amount of honour, but also for cheap classic wow gold players never spent in PvP, it's a simple trade.
The Wall