Its simpler to present just one high safety as a pay 1 blitz moving a LB onto the edge allowing for more bait opportunities. from wilkinson's blog

The most funny is when people run non-base aligned stock Cover 3 every drama. I remember earlier in the year I successfully ran a Cover 3 beater out of Bunch(Insanely simple. Literally just a run out of  Madden 23 coins the slot and motioning the out route next to out it ) with these FO Mecole Hardman on the initial play of this Madden NFL 23 game for like 4 games directly cause individuals live and die by inventory Cover 3. And dont get me wrong I do use cover 3 more than any other shell because I find it easiest to work with as I like to consumer the deep middle safety.

I simply don't know how people may come out in a stock non-base aligned Cover 3 rather than feel sus relating to this giant gap with only 1 safety on the top at the start of the play. 3 skies user is covered by non base align. The only high Safety does not bother me as you can color the DBs under to halt the corners and outs and utilize the LBs to look after the pay beaters by bumping the slot man subsequently after the crosser or pole man. Its simpler to present just one high safety as a pay 1 blitz moving a LB onto the edge allowing for more bait opportunities.

Also doesn't really matter about giving up the short play the focus is to get the opponent to have to drive down the field rather than the quick over the top TD. That works, but the second I notice you're placing hard/cloud apartments to stop an outside route(corners still conquer both of these, at least how I operate Bunch), I am putting my WR on a series and operating right past him to get an easy pretty decent gain. I will still for it up out of 5 Broad Verticals. I understand your thought process, but SO many men and women run it it's easy to dissect now. Run Tampa a game policy, the corner/lb will bulge the receiver at the beginning and slow down the trail that pressure will force them out or arrive.

Most people you are able to tell if their adhere skill is great or not, and there's usally a decent mix of them. The last time I played someone who may make a read, known coverages and the principles to use though was back in December. Pretty much everyone I've faced since then has been the adderall junkie type that runs around like a chicken with their head cut off on defense, and on crime it is working contrary to fronts and box counts they do not have the advantage against and finishing somewhere around 30%-60% of their passes.

It has been so long since I matched up against a rival who I could inform ACTUALLY knew exactly what they were doing. I have pretty decent adhere, but I remember I went crazy at the beginning of the year before HJS and catch and move and all that. I believe the most entertaining game I played this year was when I conquer someone using a mostly Giants group with my mostly Lions team 50-49 cause they missed a PAT. We all would throw a dot for a TD or an interception cause of something another person didn't make them mess up. Very fluke in that game.

I have been attempting to run an offense pretty much under center exclusive and I feel like its so hard to do this season because everyone mechanically sees you're under centre and they send the house every drama, I clearly should get better and counter this but it's simply horrible playing blitz 8 men becoming stung by cpu defense playing 2 routes at once. I'm gont stick beneath center tho because I'm simply atrocious from the shotgun and I need to stop throwing picks every 5 moves. If they defeat me, they're abuse and terrible glitches. If I beat them, they are amazing but no match for buy mut 23 coins  the unbelievable scheme. I feel exactly the exact same manner, except I shall always believe they're a bum if they're conducting the meta, even when I win.